Perhaps someone (@OJ_?) could also share the format for submitting data to the DAC?
@matmaxgeds I got temporarily excited when I stumbled into a CRS XML Schema (!) the other day. Alas, as @Herman pointed out: same organisation, same acronym, but different standard. My head doesn’t really compute this.
@reidmporter fully agree - making @andylolz obsolete should be a priority! But seriously, if we value and rely on this work, then IATI core needs to maintain it?
@JohnAdams in terms of IATI <> DAC collaboration, then I know @dalepotter was pushing (despite my unhelpful grumbling!):
Given this, we encouraged the DAC to consider setting-up a (perhaps quarterly) user group meeting/consultation call to speak directly with codelist users and other interested parties in the open and development data communities. However, given resourcing constraints, there is no capacity to do this and it is felt that an informal relationship is most sustainable, given they see their primary remit being to service DAC members. They have said that interested parties and data users are however welcome to get in touch using the contact information on their website.
Do we think this has now changed?
(wrt Discuss, I do wish it/someone can start to link threads automagically. Like on GitHub :))