IATI (tech)team is working on the new website as I understand.
During the #iatidev workshop held in Manchester this week we were in part talking about some of the elements topics currently not explicitly stated on the IATI website. I believe we had some similar ideas on what is (kind of) essential to show next to the mandatory (menu)items (what is the standard, documentation etc.) on the next IATI website.
Suggestions to take into consideration:
-
SHOWCASE: placeholder of all IATI things outside of the official IATI realm, such as: tools, portals, websites, documentation, training material, etc.etc. - This could serve as a one-stop to all. Very much missed and very much needed. Point user to showcase, provide high level description of what it is + external linking.
-
SUPPLIERS: placeholder of IATI specific suppliers: advocates, trainers, companies, etc.etc. This provides third parties with a list of all types of experts ranging from individuals to companies.
I am wondering if we a as a community could help IATI in providing input on the mentioned suggestions and if it makes sense to create an initial sitemap to structure this.
It would be a shame if this get missed for the current opportunity and we observe this after delivery. Anxious to hear how other think and curious to learn if an actual sitemap exists.
Agree, Siem. Thanks for bumping.
siemvaessen:What do you think the best way to source this detail is? Sitemap may be the last step, but something like a Google Doc to list out the content?
We could let the onus rest of the owners/creators of this content to add it to the list (which would be slower/require more prodding), or we could let the community point to everything that we know about (this could be quicker/more comprehensive - in fact, there’s some other recent threads/Google Docs that do a nice job of listing out things like CSV2IATI-esque tools.)
Buuuuut I’m slightly worried about expectation setting, i.e. “I saw this on the IATI site, I clicked through the ‘now leaving aidtransparency.net’ message without reading, and now I want organization X to respond to my request for support or question about their stuff, and if they don’t do a sufficient job, I’ll be sad and blame IATI.”
…but to be clear, I think we should do this, we just need to clear it with the orgs/tools we list.
siemvaessen:This seems less complex (who doesn’t want free advertising?), but probably should be the duty of the providers themselves to advertise their own services, i.e. I can flag ODS as a consultant in a Google Doc, but they would need to spell out what services they do/don’t want to advertise.
Oh, and (forgive our website, it’s going to be updated/upgraded soon) at the bottom of this page there’s an IATI Data Tool Inventory that I think Laia or someone else put together a year or two ago. So there’s a headstart on a list, although some of that is official IATI stuff.