The following addition to the IATI Organisation Identifier list has been proposed for Light for the World International.
Code: XI-IATI-LFTW
Name: Light for the World International
Description: Light for the World is a global disability & development organization that enables crucial eye health services and empower people with disabilities in some of the poorest regions of the world.
URL: www.light-for-the-world.org
The organisation is registered in Austria with the Interior Ministry (Bundesministerium Inneres), which is not yet listed on the org-id.guide.
If no objection is received this XI-IATI code will be approved and added in a week.
There is no ticket to add the Ministry to the org-id repository, and according to the repository:
I don’t know if IATI still has an arrangement, to me it would also make more sense to get the Ministry into org-id and let them have AT-ZVR-315688676 as their IATI identfiier.
Dear Rolf,
Ok so I understand the ministry won’t be added to the org-id repository. But why does the ministry have to be in the org-id repository in order for the org to use the ministry generated ID? I still don’t understand why they need an IATI issued ID if one exists in the public domain. And it seems you too don’t understand. Hoping the tech team can jump in here. Seems you’ve already provided the ID here.
Kind Regards,
Michelle
I think the main issue is that org-id decides whether AT-ZVR will be used as prefix. Since ZVR is the abbreviation used by the Ministry as well, that is likely. But not guaranteed.
It looks like a pretty straightforward process to add, but I don’t know about the arrangements, or the research that org-id wants to do or the information they would need.
As stated, there isn’t any. Currently, org-id still sits with us at Open Data Services Cooperative, having started life as a cross-standards collaboration. We still maintain things , and have arrangements to respond to requests from initiatives such as Open Contracting, 360Giving & Beneficial Ownership Data Standard. From our perspective, this is infrastructure that helps us all.
We’ve reached out to the IATI Technical Team in that we do have some technical things in place that make it easier to submit a proposal (directly as a Pull Request), which we hope is helpful.
BUT - the core issue here is about research, not code. It’s still amazing that for an international initiative, we’re asking people to go and research lists in other languages and countries. We’re very clear that this is research we are not qualified to do, or even want to do it! I think we need to have this conversation in IATI very quickly.
To avoid a long thread on the title of XI-IATI-LFTW, I’ll create a new post here on Discuss. Look forward to the XI-engagement…